Scientific Interest and Novelty
This study has carried out extensive economic, technical, environmental
and social evaluations of pilot-phase JI projects between donors from Western
Europe, and hosts in Central and Eastern Europe. Site visits have been
undertaken to collect and to verify good quality operating data for the
selected projects. This data has been used to calculate the values of four
critical accounting variables for each of the case studies against a range
of credible baselines. Scenario analysis and stochastic simulation techniques
have been used to estimate the impact of uncertainty on these variables.
In addition, the study has performed broad environmental and social assessments
of the case study projects. It is believed that this evaluation represents
the most detailed and wide-ranging assessment anywhere of bilateral energy-sector
investment projects carried out during the FCCC’s AIJ "pilot-phase".
This study has carried out a thorough analysis of the crediting arrangements
established under the Kyoto Protocol. It has drawn attention in particular
to the implications of the potential for "interim period banking" of emission
reduction credits under the Clean Development Mechanism. This analysis
represents the first quantitative assessment of the environmental cost
of introducing this degree of flexibility into global climate policy.
This study has taken a unique approach to the operationalisation and
to the evaluation of JI. The work has highlighted that JI operates under
multiple objectives and is defined by a variety of operating parameters.
It has shown that each operational form of JI offers different incentives
for gaming, and performs very differently in terms of underlying objectives
such as environmental effectiveness, equity and economic efficiency. This
study is unique in illustrating how decision analysis techniques could
be applied to the evaluation of different operational forms of JI. In addressing
the management of irreducible uncertainty in the evaluation of emission
reductions and costs, this study has proposed an innovative operational
framework in which standardised procedures are combined with institutional
safeguards.
Back to Main Results
Forward to Policy Relevance
Return to Accounting and Accreditation page